2008 Supreme(Raj) 2279
VINEET KOTHARI
Thakur Anand Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shri Kamal Singh – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr.R.R.Nagori, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr.Jagat Tatia on behalf of Mr.Manish Shishodia, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.2.2005 whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application of the plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 14 Civil Procedure Code. for production of original documents at the stage of plaintiff's evidence.
3. The learned trial Court has held that since only photo-copies of these documents were produced along with the plaint and list of documents filed with the plaint and no reason has been assigned for delay in submitting the original documents. Therefore, the application under Order 7 Rule 14 Civil Procedure Code. did not deserve to be allowed.
4. Having heard the learned, this Court is of the opinion that the plaintiff was prevented by sufficient cause in not producing the documents within time as he was suffering from heart ailment and ultimately the said plaintiff Thakur Anand Singh expired and presently his LRs are pursuing the present litigation.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order dated 14.2.2005 is set aside and this writ petition is allowed. The learned trial Court shall allow the plaintiff to produce these documents in original on the
Click Here to Read the rest of this document