SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 1436

M.A.A.KHAN
Hari Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Heard. This is an application under section 439(2) Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents Ghariba and Vinod on 6.7.1999 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dholpur in Sessions Case No. 99/98. The above named respondents, along with the co-accused in the case were alleged to have 5 caused death of the deceased and simple and grievous hurt with sharp and blunt weapons to a number of prosecution witnesses. Thrice, the learned Additional Sessions judge had himself declined to admit the respondents to bail. This Court too had refused bail to them vide its order dated 1.9.98 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4373/98 Smt. Santro and ors. v. State of Rajasthan .

2. The IVth application for bail was moved before the learned trial Judge after his recording the statement of three eye-witnesses. Although the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant opposed the said application, particularly on the ground that both the respondents had been attributed active participation in the vigant incident and specific injuries were caused by them on vital part of the body of the deceased and that as many as nine injured witnesses were







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top