SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 455

S.N.BHARGAVA
Satish Chand Yogi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - As per the facts mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner was employed as a Junior Engineer on work-charge basis from August, 1988 to November, 1989 on the wages of Rs. 20/- per day, and from December, 1988 to February, 1989, on the wages of Rs. 40/- per day. He was performing the duties and functions of Junior Engineer like other regularly appointed Junior Engineers. The services of the petitioner were discontinued from February, 1989 without assigning any reason. The petitioner made representation but with no result. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition on 29.3.1989.

2. Notice were issued on 4.4.1989 as to why the writ petition should not be admitted and disposed of. The rule was made returnable within four weeks. A reply of the writ petition was filed or. behalf of the non petitioners on 5.7.1989, to which a rejoinder was also filed by the petitioner on 5.1.1990. The State Government has further filed reply to the rejoinder on 16th May, 1990. Arguments have been heard.

3. The State Government in its reply has submitted that the petitioner was appointed as a Surveyor on work-charge basis to make the survey of Beawar-Bheem Road on National Highway-8, for


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top