SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 921

S.N.BHARGAVA
Harish Kumar Nagar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:S.K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the State:B.K. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. S.N. Bhargava, J. - As per the facts stated in the memo of writ petition, the petitioner appeared in 3rd Year Electrical Engineering Examination held in the month of November, 1989. He was alleged to have used unfair means in the examination held on 10.5.1990. A notice dated 21.7.90 was served on the petitioner to submit his explanation. The petitioner submitted the reply on 21.7.1990 itself. In, the reply, he had given detailed explanation denying the charges levelled against him. He requested that he should be supplied copies of the Invigilator's report, Examiner's report, copy of admission letter and copy of his answer book. He further made request for affording personal hearing but no documents, as requested by him, were supplied to him and the respondent No. 2 vide order dated 30.11.1990 cancelled the petitioner's examination of 3rd Year Electrical Engineering, held in the month of November, 1989. He was further debarred from appearing in the examination to be held till May, 1990 and was also further directed not to study in the institution. The present writ petition has been filed on 10.12.1990 seeking to quash the orders Annexures-5 and 6, dated 30.11.1990 and 6.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top