SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1531

R.R.YADAV
Kalu S/o Seva – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Heard the learned counsel for the accused applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

2. In all these bail applications, common question of law, in the light of notification, issued by Central Government, in exercise of its power, conferred by Explanation (1) to Section 27 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in supersession of earlier notifications of Government of India in the Ministry of Finance Department dated 14.11.85, is involved, therefore, all these bail applications can be disposed of by a composite order.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the accused applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The quantity of different drugs, recovered from possession of the accused applicants, fall within the definition of `small quantity', specified by Central Government, in the aforesaid notification.

5. It is urged by the learned counsel for the accused applicants that the accused applicants, in these cases, if the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance possessed or consumed, is cocaine, morphine, diacetyl morphine or any other narcotic drug or any psychotropic substance, as may be specified by Central Government, by notificat








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top