1. 1. Heard Shri Mohd. Rafiq learned Additional Advocate General for the appellants and Mr. R.P. Garg, Mrs. Naina Saraf and Mr. K.N. Gupta for the respondents.

2. These three appeals have been preferred against an order passed by the learned Single Judge in the writ petitions bearing Nos. SB Civil Writ Petition No. 2965/2000, 4631/1998 and 2348/2000. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the learned Single Judge has directed the State Government to disclose the entire evidence along with the charge sheet, in a case in which the proceedings are governed by the rules, framed under the statute which do not provide such a procedure. Learned counsel for the appellants has also submitted that the judicial officer entrusted with the inquiry had rendered clear findings and the State Government had to pass fresh orders in accordance with those findings. He, therefore, submits that impugned order is against the procedure prescribed under the law and the same deserves to be set aside.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that a bare perusal of the inquiry report, annexed to the writ petition, would show that it was a non-speaking order in which no findings, what