SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1618

SHASHI KANT SHARMA
Gulab Jati – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Since both the above mentioned S.B. Criminal Revision Petition and the Criminal Misc. Petition related to the same controversy, both are being decided by this common order.

2. S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 591/2000 filed by the petitioner Gulab, Ram Kishan and Balu Ram is is directed against the order dated 18th of October, 2000, passed by the learned Civil Judge (JD) and Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Laxmangarh. District Sikar whereby, the learned Magistrate took cognizance for the offence under Section 436 IPC and issued non-bailable warrants to produce these accused petitioners.

3. The facts related to both the cases are that in the present matter a complaint was filed by the complainant non-petitioner Ishwar Ram against the accused petitioners for the offence under Section 436 IPC etc. The police after investigation, submitted a final report before the concerned Magistrate. The Magistrate recorded statements of the witnesses of the complainant non-petitioner and after consider the facts of the case accepted the final report vide order dated 18th April, 1998 and did not take cognizance against the petitioners. Against that order the complainant non-petitioner








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top