SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 3096

NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN
Harinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Sanjay Singhal, Advocate.
For the Party: H.N. Gupta, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the papers made available to me during the course of arguments.

2. The petitioners have filed this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for transatory bail for 15 days in FIR No. 115/2005 registered at Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad (U.P) for offence under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have apprehension of their arrest in the State of Rajasthan in the aforesaid FIR, therefore, till they approach the competent court in the State of U.P. For their bail, an interim bail order in the nature of transitory bail may be passed in their favour. Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the judgment of the Court reported in WLC 2003 (Raj.) UC page 258 and another judgment passed by this Court in the Case of Jyoti Sharma v. State of Rajasthan. S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2686/2005 decided on 30.5.2005 .

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has no objection to the grant of transitory bail to the petitioners for 15 days.

5. Taking into c




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top