SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Raj) 730

Y.R.MEENA
Mangi Lal Kothari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - By this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the incident took place as back as in the year 1974 and only 8 witnesses have been examined out of 19 witnesses in more than 10 years, and the prosecution witnesses have not supported the case of prosecution. Therefore, the proceedings against the petitioner for the offence under section 409 and 467 IPC be quashed.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 30.10.74, the petitioner has received Rs. 500/- on the basis of one Voucher of Rs. 500/-, the amount was payable to one Nawal Khan for his job work in construction of school building. The amount was drawn by the petitioner in the capacity of Sarpanch, at that time. The F.I.R. was lodged against the petitioner that petitioner has misappropriated Rs. 500/- by forged voucher, in the name of Nawal Khan. After Investigation the Challan was filed against the petitioner for the offence under section 409 & 467 IPC. During trial prosecution has examined as many as 8 witnesses by February, 1993. Then an application was moved before the trial court that the proceedings be dropped as the prosecution has failed to examine its witnesses, even after, completing of 10 years.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top