SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 742

R.S.VERMA, Y.R.MEENA
Ashok Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. Admittedly, a house of the appellant was given on rent to the Social Welfare Department Rajasthan, Jaipur for running a hostel. Initially, rent was fixed at Rs. 140/-per month. However, in July, 1986, additional constructions & renovations were made by the appellant in the said house and he invested a sum of Rs. 30,000/- on this count. The Public Works Department assessed the revised rental value at Rs. 860/- per month and the tenant-department agreed to make the payment of the rent at Rs. 860/- and a sanction was issued vide order dated 203.90 (Annexure-2) by which it was ordered that the rent may be paid w.e.f. 1.8.1986 at the rate of Rs. 860/- per month. However, the rent was not paid and subsequently by another order dated 293.1990 (Annex. 9), earlier sanction (Ann. 2) was withdrawn. No reason was given for withdrawing that sanction, with the result that no rent has been paid to the petitioner-appellant. The appellant filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2746/1992 before this Court. The writ petition was heard by a learned Single Judge who vide his judgment/order dated 17.3.1993 dismissed the writ peti






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top