2004 Supreme(Raj) 1320
S.K.KESHOTE
Guddu S/o Late Fakrudeen – Appellant
Versus
Chiragudeen S/o Abdul Shakoor – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Z.A. Naqvi, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M.T Alvi, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the revision petition and the order of the learned trial court impugned therein.This revision petition under Section 115 of the CPC is directed against the judgment and decree dated 3.4.2002 of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) No. 1, Jaipur City, Jaipur, in Civil Suit No. 302/89.The suit has been filed by the plaintiff respondents under Section 6 of the Special Relief Act, 1963 (for short, 'the Act, 1963').The learned counsel for the defendant petitioners submitted that sine qua non for grant of decree under Section 6 of the Act, 1963 is wholly missing in the suit. It is contended that the plaintiff respondents have not given out the date on which they were dispossessed from the suit property. Referring to the amended plaint, the learned counsel for the defendant petitioners submitted that as regards to the date of dispossession of the plaintiff respondents from the suit property therein the blanks are left.The learned counsel for the plaintiff respondents, on the other hand, supported the judgment of the learned trial court.Section 6 of the Act, 1963 provides that if any person is dispossessed without his co
Click Here to Read the rest of this document