SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2278

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Pushp Raj – Appellant
Versus
Manga Ram @ Mangilal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Rakesh Arora, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - In this second appeal filed under Section 100, C.P.C., the appellant-plaintiff is challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.05.1992 passed by the District Judge, Balotra in Civil Appeal No.10/87, whereby, the learned first appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree dated 05.08.1987 passed by the Civil Judge, Balotra in Civil Suit No.20/83 and dismissed the suit with cost.

2. Brief facts of the case are that a suit for specific performance of contract was filed by the appellant-plaintiff before the Civil Judge, Barmer (Camp Balotra), in which, it is stated that he is adopted son of late Keshari Mal Oswal who died on 19.06.1981 and, during his life-time, respondent Manga Ram @ Mangilal executed an agreement to sell his share of khatedari land and, for the same, sale consideration of Rs.7,000/- was fixed, out of which, Rs.6,000/- were paid by late Kesharimal on 21.12.1979 and rest of the amount i.e., Rs.1,000/- was agreed to be paid at the time of registry of the sale-deed.

3. In the suit, it is specifically stated that father of respondent Mangaram, Budhaji was having agricultural land and, in the suit for partition, in all, 29 and a half bigha and 2 biswa land w































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top