SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 2331

VINEET KOTHARI
Tilotamma – Appellant
Versus
Anoop Kumar – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Prakash Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ajitabh Acharya and Amitabh Acharya, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. This transfer application has been filed by the petitioner-wife Smt. Tilotamma under Section 24 of the C.P.C. seeking transfer of matrimonial case filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights by the respondent-husband in the Court of learned Additional Distt. Judge No. 1, Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur. The said transfer of proceedings is sought from Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur to Bikaner where the petitioner-wife Smt. Tilotamina is presently residing with her father.

3. The petitioner has averred in the application for transfer that the marriage took place between the parties on 26.11.1996 and the issue of said wedlock, a daughter, Harshita was born on 3.5.1998. Thereafter a son was also born to them on 25.1.2006. However, the parties fell apart and they are living separately for last about 2 years. The petitioner-wife has further stated that she has moved a divorce petition in the Court of learned Distt. Judge, Bikaner, which is registered as case No. 167/2007 and had also filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance which is Criminal Case No. 223/2007 in the Court of le






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top