SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 888

GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner has sought intervention of this Court by filing this writ petition on the plea that although he had been selected for appointment on the post of Conductor in the year 1984, the same has not yet been made effective. A little probe into the facts in this regard discloses that in the year 1984, applications were invited for the post of Conductors by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (shortly referred to as RSRTC) through the Regional Manager, in response to which the petitioner also had applied along with others. A committee for the required selection was constituted in the year 1984 for Alwar Region and the petitioner had been selected. Accordingly, his name was placed at Sr. No. 445A of the select list. This select list was thereafter sent to the Regional Manager, RSRTC, Jaipur who issued an order on 14.6.1985 directing the selected candidates to undergo special training. The petitioner was dismayed not to find his name in the list of persons who had to undergo the said training. The petitioner therefore represented to the concerned authorities in the RSRTC, who after examining the entire record accepted the plea of the petitioner 'regarding








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top