1. - These revision petitions have been filed against the common order of the learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Jodhpur dated October 5, 1993 by which he has dismissed the applications for calling the records relating to the income tax assessments of the defendant-non-petitioner Parasmal from the Income Tax Office, Jodhpur.

2. The facts of the cases giving rise to these revision petitions may be summarised thus. Four different plaintiff-petitioners have filed suits against the same defendant Parasmal for the recovery of certain amounts deposited by them with him. In all the four suits, the defendant Parasmal denied the deposits. Applications were moved in all four suits for summoning the relevant records from the Income-tax Office, Jodhpur relating to the assessment of the defendant Paras Mal. The defendant-non-petitioner Parasmal did not file his reply in any suit. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, applications moved in three suits were dismissed on the grounds that records cannot be summoned under Order 13 Rule 6, C.P.C. from an office, certified copies of the desired documents and list of witnesses have not been filed by the plaintiff in any suit and