SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 596

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
N.C.Kochhar, J.
Surendra Bhatia - Appellant
Versus
Poonam Bhatia and Another - Respondent
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 996 of 1993.
Decided On : 21-01-1994

The court has the authority to appoint a local commissioner to execute a commission for examining witnesses residing outside its jurisdiction, in order to facilitate the proof of a will's genuineness.

Headnote:

Will Execution - International Jurisdiction - The court allowed the petitioner to appoint a local commissioner to execute a commission for examining witnesses residing in Germany, in order to prove the genuineness of a will executed by the deceased.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to prove the genuineness of a will executed by the deceased in Germany, but the witnesses were not within the jurisdiction of the court.

Finding of the Court:

The court accepted the revision petition, set aside the previous order, and appointed a local commissioner to execute a commission for examining the witnesses in Germany.

Issues: Dispute over the genuineness of the will and the inability to summon witnesses residing outside the court's jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the appointment of a local commissioner to execute a commission for examining witnesses residing outside the court's jurisdiction, in order to facilitate the proof of the will's genuineness.

Final Decision: The revision petition was accepted, the previous order was set aside, and a local commissioner was appointed to execute a commission for examining the witnesses in Germany.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner wants to prove that Shri Sudarshan Kumar Bhatia (the deceased), the late husband of the respondent No. 1 and the father of the respondent No. 2 and who was the brother of the petitioner, had executed a will while he was staying at Frank-furt in Germany in presence of Mrs. Brigitte Rosmarie Goerke, resident of Bohmerstrassee 5,6000 Frank-furt am Main, West Germany and Dr. Ury Fehr, resident of Wilhelm-Busch-Strass 16, 6096 Raunheim, West Germany,whereby he had bequeath his property in favour of the petitioner and the respondent No. 2. The genuineness of the will is in dispute and, in order to prove that the will propounded by the petitioner is the last will and testament of the deceased, the petitioner wants to examine the above said two witnesses as the attesting witnesses of the will. The learned trial court directed the petitioner to procure the attendance of the witnesses, but, he having failed to do so, his request for their examination was rejected vide the impugned order dated 30-7-1993. Hence this revision petition by the petitioner.

2. It has not been disputed before me that the above said witnesses are residents of Germany and are not within the jurisdiction of the courts of this country and, as such, cannot be summoned to appear in the learned trial court. It has further not been disputed that the witnesses are required to be examined in order to examine the contention of the petitioner. When this matter came up before me on 10-12-1993, the learned counsel for the parties agreed that an open Commission be issued for examination of the witnesses concerned and that the expenses of the learned counsel for the respondents as also of the learned local commissioner, besides the fee of the learned local commissioner would be paid by the petitioner who would also pay for the charges for procuring the attendance of the witnesses before the learned local commissioner at the place of the execution of the commission besides the hotel and food charges of the learned local commissioner and of the learned counsel for the respondents for three days at the place concerned.Thereafter, the case was adjourned and the file has been put up today.

3. Shri H.M. Bhargava, who is an Advocate of this court and is present in court, has agreed to execute the commission. The learned counsel for the parties also agree to the appointment of Shri Bhargava as the local commissioner for this purpose.

4. In these circumstances, the revision petition is accepted, the impugned order dated 30-7-1993 is set aside and Shri H.M. Bhargava, Advocate is appointed as the local commissioner. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner, and fee of Shri Bhargava is tentatively fixed at Rs. 25,000/-, to be paid by the petitioner, who would also make arrangement for obtaining visa of Shri Bhargava at his cost and would pay the charges for obtaining of visa by the learned counsel for the respondents and would also pay the expenses of the learned counsel for the respondents for stay and hotel, food and transport charges in connection with the commission proceedings for a period of three days. The respondent No. I states that Shri M.L. Lonial, Advocate, Delhi is her cousin and would be representing the respondents during the commission proceedings before the learned local commissioner. It is agreed between the learned counsel for the parties that the expenses for the learned counsel for the respondents for arranging visa and for his stay etc. in Frank-furt would be Rs. 17,500/-. It is further agreed that the petitioner would deposit two return executive class air tickets from New Delhi to Frank-furt; one in the name of Shri H.M. Bhargava, Advocate and the other in the name of Shri M.L. Lonial, Advocate. The petitioner will pay the fee of the learned local commissioner and the expenses of the learned counsel for the respondents by way of cheques within one week from today and would submit receipts and the above said two air ticket



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top