SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 1357

Y.R.MEENA
Vinod Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Financial Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - By this writ petition, the petitioner prayed that respondent RFC be directed to hand over the industrial unit situated in plot No. 81 and 82 to petitioner and Mrs. Sudarshana Sharma upon payment of its legitimate dues calculated on the basis of its policy, guidelines and circulars.

2. The case of petitioner that petitioner has set up a proprietorship concern in the name and style of M/s. Uma Enterprises in the year 1978 for establishing and running a marble cutting and polishing ---. Upon an application made in this respect, the petitioner was granted a temporary registration by the District Industries Centre on 25.4.1978. For the purpose of establishing a marble cutting o unit in the name and style or M/s. Uma Enterprises, the petitioner applied to the District Industries Centre for grant of margin money loan which was sanctioned in.March, 1979, but that was not sufficient, and thereafter, petitioner approached to Rajasthan Financial Corporation (hereinafter, referred as 'RFC') and RFC has sanctioned loan of Rs.1.38 Lacs. The case of petitioner that to secure the said loan s amount, the requisite mortgage deed in respect of plot No. 82 was signed by the petitioner in
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top