1. - This C.M.A. under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act (for short the `Act') has been directed against the order dated 1.10.1994, passed by learned Additional District Judge No. 6, Jaipur City, Jaipur, rejecting the application under Section 34 of the Act in suit No.130/91.

2. Brief relevant facts of this appeal are that the plaintiff respondent Chunni Lal filed a suit for dissolution of partnership firm and rendition of accounts, with the allegations that the appellant and respondent No.1 Chunni Lal started a business in partnership in the name of M/s Lal Chand Moti Lal Oil Mills on 1.10.1980; that the partnership was at will, that the disputes arose between the parties, and that that appellant included his son Rakesh Kumar, respondent No.2 in the partnership business in illegal way and got electricity connection in his name even though there was an electricity-connection in the name of partnership firm itself. In Para No.7 of the plaint, it has been mentioned that on 10.10.1990, Serva Shri Gouri Shankar Thawaria, Ram Nath, Shiv Prasad Kanungo, Damodar Das Agrawal and Sita Ram Agrawal were appointed arbitrators and it was expected from them that they would resolve the di