SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 766

S.N.BHARGAVA
Chhoga Ram Mundoliya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - As per the facts mentioned in the memo of writ petition petitioner deposited security amount of Rs. 1500/- and also paid quarterly dead-rent amounting to Rs. 1500/- in advance on 20.1.1984. Lease deed was registered in his favour on 16.1.1984 and the annual dead-rent was fixed at Rs. 6,000/-, The petitioner had been granted mining lease for ten years w.e.f. 20.1.1984 for mineral Marble, near Dhani of Village Narmanpur, Distt. Ajmer, for an area measuring 100x100 meters in Khasra No. 786. The site of the aforesaid mining area was shown on the papers but no physical or actual possession was delivered to the petitioner by the department. Sultan Singh and his son Ajeet Singh obstructed as they were cultivators of neighbouring field and therefore, the matter was referred to the concerned authorities of the Department and it was requested to evict those persons from the mining area so that mining operations could be started. The petitioner made his all efforts by contacting all the concerned authorities but with no result. However, the Tehsildar, Ajmer, inspected the site and proceeded Under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956. The S.D.M. Ajmer also rejected



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top