SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 2555

SANDEEP MEHTA
Sohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:G.R. Shari, Advocate.
For the State: A.R. Nikub, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard counsel for the petitioners. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 23.3.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Nohar in connection with Final report No. 69/1990 whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 306/34 I.P.C. and against the order dated 23.3.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Hanumangarh Headquarter Nohar, affirming the said order in revision.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have challenged the order taking cognizance, which is an ex parte order. He submits that the police has given Final Report in the matter on the basis of the statement of complainant and other witnesses recorded during the course of proceedings under Section 174 Cr.P.C. As well as during investigation. Now the cognizance has been taken on the strength of statements under Section 200/202 Cr.P.C. which disclose a highly exaggerated version on the part of the complainant. He submits that the F.I.R. was filed after one month of the alleged occurrence and if the complete investigation papers are read then t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top