SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1406

SANDEEP MEHTA
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:L.D. Khatri, Advocate.
For the State: M.A. Bhurat, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the proceedings in Criminal Regular Case No. 223/2003 going on against the petitioner in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mount Abu, district Sirohi for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B, I.P.C.

2. Succinctly stated the facts, relevant and necessary for the disposal of his miscellaneous petition, are that the complainant-respondent No. 2 filed a written complaint in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Abu Road with the allegations that he was an agent of Sahyog Housing Development (I) Limited, Sirohi and acting on behalf of the said company, he collected money from various persons as Fixed Deposits for one to five years and in turn he entrusted the money so collected to the accused, who are also the representatives of the Sahyog Housing Development Ltd. The complainant alleged that he was assured by the accused that the society is recognised in the States of Rajasthan as well as Gujarat and the deposits made by him continued till 12.5.1994. Thereafter the complainant-respondent No. 2 came to know that the office of the Society at







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top