SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1784

SANDEEP MEHTA
Prakash Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Rajesh Joshi, Advocate.
For the State: A.R. Nikub, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The instant miscellaneous petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the proceedings of the Complaint Case No. 179/2001 pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanore, district Udaipur and against the order dated 27.7.2001 passed by the learned trial Court whereby cognizance was taken against the petitioner for the offence under Section 7 (1) read with Section 16 (1) (a) and (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, "the P.F.A. Act").

2. Succinctly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner is said to be running a proprietorship concern in the name and style of "M/s. Hemant General Stores" at Kanore. The Food Inspector of the area is said to have taken a sample of prepackaged salt of the brand "Annpurna" from the petitioner's shop on 22.12.2000 and the same was subjected to analysis by the Public Health Laboratory, Udaipur. The Public Analyst submitted his report dated 24.01.2001 and the conclusion as per the report was that the sample was misbranded because the statement regarding month/year, upto which the product could be best for consumption, was not mentioned on the packet "in capit




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top