SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 2160

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Haroon – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:B.M. Bhojak, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Anees Bhurat, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The appellant has preferred instant criminal appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. to challenge the judgment dated 25.7.1996 passed by the Special Judge, Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Pratapgarh, whereby, the trial Court convicted the appellant for the offence under Section 447 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(v) of the SC and ST (Prevention of atrocities) Act, 1989 and passed sentence for three months rigorous imprisonment for offence under Section 447 I.P.C. and one year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2000/- for offence under Section 3(1)(v) of the Act of 1989.

2. Brief facts of the case are that a complaint was filed by the complainant Sint. Mangi Bai who belongs to Scheduled Caste community in the Court of Additional Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh on 17.2.1992 in which it is alleged by her that appellant and his son Ashraf committed theft of standing crop of her agricultural field, therefore, action may be. taken against them. The concerned Magistrate sent the said complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to the Police Station Rathanjna, Village Gadola, District Chittorgarh. Upon receiving the said complaint, the Police






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top