SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 2665

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Praveen @ Montu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


For the Petitioner:M.K. Kaushik and Vinay Pal Yadav, Advocates.
For the State: B.N. Sandhu, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - Since the controversy involved in both the petitions arises out of common facts and same judgment, hence same are being decided by this common Juagment.

2. These two revision petitions have been filed against the order dated 12th of August 2008 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, No. 3, Ajmer (Rajasthan) (for short the appellate court') in Criminal Appeal No. 20/07 (336/06) whereby he partly modified the order dated 28th of November 2006 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) & Judicial Magistrate No.3, Ajmer (for short the trial court') in Criminal Case No. 479/2005 and convicted the petitioner Praveen @ Montu for the offence under Section 454 I.P.C. and sentenced him for the period of three years rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 3,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months rigorous imprisonment and the accused petitioner Ram Gopal has been convicted for the offence under Section 411 I.P.C. and sentenced him for the period of one year rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 3,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months simple imprisonment.

3. Mr. M.K. Kaushik counsel ap










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top