SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1665

S.P.PATHAK
Pawan Kumar Beniwal – Appellant
Versus
Satya Prakash Mehant – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Tarun Jain, Advocate.
For the State: Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.01.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur in Criminal Revision No. 51/2009 whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and the order dated 19.08.2009 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sawai Madhopur has been upheld.

2. Briefly stated, the facts for the disposal of the present petition are that the petitioner is facing trial in the court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sawai Madhopur for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (here-in-after to be referred as, 'the Act'). On 13.07.2009, an application was moved by the petitioner for examination of specimen of his signature on the cheque (Ex.-1) for expert opinion. A reply to the application was filed. The learned trial court after hearing both sides vide order dated 19.08.2009 dismissed the application. The petitioner, having felt aggrieved by this order, preferred a revision petition which was dismissed by the learned revisional court vide its order dated 25.01.2010. Hence, the present misc. petition ha






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top