1. - A licence issued by Labour Department to shop-keeper cannot be said to be valuable security as defined u/s. 30 of IPC. N.N. Mathur, J.-I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and. perused the order dated 14.8.2001 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST.(Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Udaipur.

2. The relevant facts giving rise to the instant petition are that the petitioner-Sint. Anita was married to Ashok Kumar in November, 1987. She was being ill-treated in her in-laws house and ultimately, turned out in the year 1991. She filed an application for restitution of conjugal rights in the Family Court, Udaipur which was decreed on 25.11.1995. In execution, the articles lying in the shop of her husband namely M/s. Surendra Saree Centre were attached. Ashok Kumar produced a licence showing Ratan Lal as the proprietor of the shop. Subsequently, it revealed that a false licence was produced by Vinod Kumar, a Clerk and Praveen Kumar, a Inspector in the Shop and Commercial Establishment of Labour Department in conspriacy with accused-Ashok Kumar and Ratan Lal. The certificate was of the year 1984, whereas, Praveen Kumar entered in the services in the year 1993. On these f