SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 3106

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
B.Prasad, S.P.Pathak, JJ.
Sajjan Kumar and Ors. - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 816 of 2002.
Decided On : 11-07-2005

For the Appellants:M.L. Garg, Advocate.
For the Party: Vishnu Kachhwaha, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant:A.S. Rathore for Sangeet Lodha, Advocates.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860 – S. 148, 302/149, 302, 324, 324/149, 323, 447 – The present case is an appeal against conviction for the offence of murder – the accused were 9 and there were only 4 injuries on the body of the deceased – the omnibus allegations against all accused are not supported by the medical evidence – only the injury inflicted on the head of the deceased by ‘S’ was a fatal injury leading to the death of the deceased – his conviction is maintained under – S. 148, 302, 323 and 447 – the conviction against other accused under – S. 302/149 IPC is set aside but conviction under – S. 323, 324, 324/149, 447 and 148 IPC is upheld.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, Distt, Churu in Sessions Case No. 8/99 dated 27.9.2002 Learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the accused appellants as under :



Offences

Punishment

1.

All accused appellants

Sec. 148 Indian Penal Code

One year R.I.

2.

Sajjan Kumar

Sec. 302 Indian Penal Code

Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine six months R.I.


All other accused appellants

Sec. 302/149 Indian Penal Code


3.

Rajkumar & Rejveer

Sec. 324 Indian Penal Code

One year R.I.


All other accused appellants

Sec. 324/149 Indian Penal Code

One year K.I.

4.

All accused

Sec. 323 Indian Penal Code

Three months R.I.


Appellants

Sec. 447 Indian Penal Code

One month S.I.


2. The prosecution was initiated on the basis of the first information report recorded on the basis of the statement of PW 1 Dharamveer given to Nathu Singh ASI. According to the statement of Dharmveer PW 1 which resulted into the first information report, it was alleged that there is animosity in between the complainant and the accused party and litigation is pending in between them. It was alleged that on 11.10.1998 at about 9.30 A.M. complainant, his father Ramdutt, his brother Rajpal were in their field. Rajpal was tilling the field and the first informant and Ramdutt were working in the field. It was said that on the western side of the field, Mamchand S/o Birbal has his field. He came on the boundary of the complainant's field and started tilling the part of boundary of the field with plough. He was detested by the first informant, his brother and father.

3. At that time, all other accused persons who were working in their field, came to the spot armed with various weapons. Accused Sajjan Kumar soon after arrival gave a 'Rampadi' blow on the head of Ramdutt. Consequently, complainant's father fell on the ground. On this, other accused persons started giving him beating by various weapons. While the complainant and his brother Rajpal intervened to rescue, complainant Dharamveer was given an axe blow by Rajkumar on his head. Accused Rajveer gave 'Barchi' blow on his left leg. Sajjan Kumar gave 'Kampadi' blow on the left hand of Rajpal. Accused Somveer gave a lathi blow on the shoulder. On raising shouts, Jogender, Ajay Kumar and wife of Rajpal Sunita arrived. They were also given beating by various weapons. After that, Ramjilal, Chandrabhan and Dharamveer S/o Sohanlal also arrived at the scene of occurrence. After beating the injured were taken to hospital at Rajgarh. During the course of treatment, Ramdutt died in the hospital. The statement of complainant as was recorded in the hospital was sent to police station, where a formal FIR No. 197/98 was registered. After recording of the first information report, charge-sheet was filed against the accused persons and the case came to the trial Court for trial. Charges were framed against the accused persons as follows :

Sajjan Kumar Sections 148, 302, 324/149, 323, 447 Indian Penal Code

Rest of accused persons Sections 148, 302/149, 324/149, 323 & 447 Indian Penal Code

4. The accused persons denied the charges and claimed trial. At the trial, the prosecution examined 17 witnesses and produced 71 various documents. Accused Sajjan Kumar in the statement under section 313 Indian Penal Code stated that Ramdutt, Dharamveer came to their field and his father Harish Chandra was given beating. In this process, Ramdutt and Dharamveer sustained injuries. The information was given to him by his father. Accused Bhateri in her statement stated that Ramdutt and Dharamveer wanted to obstruct the way of the field and in




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top