SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 3106

B.PRASAD, S.P.PATHAK
Sajjan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


For the Appellants:M.L. Garg, Advocate.
For the Party: Vishnu Kachhwaha, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant:A.S. Rathore for Sangeet Lodha, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, Distt, Churu in Sessions Case No. 8/99 dated 27.9.2002 Learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the accused appellants as under :



Offences

Punishment

1.

All accused appellants

Sec. 148 Indian Penal Code

One year R.I.

2.

Sajjan Kumar

Sec. 302 Indian Penal Code

Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine six months R.I.


All other accused appellants

Sec. 302/149 Indian Penal Code


3.

Rajkumar & Rejveer

Sec. 324 Indian Penal Code

One year R.I.


All other accused appellants

Sec. 324/149 Indian Penal Code

One year K.I.

4.

All accused

Sec. 323 Indian Penal Code

Three months R.I.


Appellants

Sec. 447 Indian Penal Code

One month S.I.


2. The prosecution was initiated on the basis of the first information report recorded on the basis of
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top