SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2770

R.S.CHAUHAN
Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Bhanwar Bagri, Advocate.
For the Party: Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - Accused of having committing an offence under Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (henceforth to be referred as the N.D.P.S. Act in short), the petitioner has challenged the cognizance order dated 13.9.2005 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act Cases), Chabra, District Baran.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 7.7.2005, the S.H.O. Shri Sudhir Kumar Yadav P.S. Harnoda Sahaji, District Baran, submitted a report wherein he stated that while he and his police party were out on inspection in Taragarh valley, they saw two persons walking with plastic white bag. When these two persons saw the Police Jeep, they started running, therefore, the police chased them. Constable, Dharmendra Singh, caught one of the men, who revealed his name as Vinod Kumar. Since Vinod Kumar did not know the name of the other person, he could not reveal the same to the police. When the said plastic bag was searched, it contained almost 4 kgs. of opium including the weight of plastic bag. Since, Vinod Kumar could not show any license, therefore, the police registered a case for offence under Section 8/18 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Subsequently, the investigation was handed over









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top