SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1746

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Shiv Kumar Sharma, Khem Chand Sharma, JJ.
Ram Gopal & others - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 157 of 1996.
Decided On : 21-08-2001

Advocates:
For the Appellants:Ajeet Kumar, Advocate.
For the State: Rajendra Yadav, Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:

A. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - The appeal was filed against the conviction under s.302 as the facts was showing that 'G' only inflicted one gandasi blow on the head of deceased and that one blow was not sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death of the deceased and even deceased died after two days of the incident- In appeal, the conviction was altered from s.302 to s.304 Pt.II of IPC- Sentence modified- Accused was in jail from last 5 years and 9 months his sentence was reduced to period to already gone.

B. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 324 - The conviction was challenged in appeal as the Appellant 'D' inflict simple injury on the left thigh of deceased by Sharp edged weapon corroborated by medical evidence- The accused was convicted under s.324 of IPC and his sentence was modified in an appeal -Appellant remained in custody for 3 months and 26 days, sentence reduced to period already undergone but fine raised from Rs. 500/- to Rs. 20,000/-- Appeal was accepted.

JUDGMENT

1. - The seven appellants before us are members of one family. They were indicated for having committed murder of Ghasi Lal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1 Kota in Sessions Case No. 46/92. All were found guilty, convicted and sentenced vide judgment dated 23.2.1996 by the learned Judge as under:-

1.

Ghanshyam

under section. 302 Indian Penal Code

to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to further undergo R.I. for two years




under section. 148 Indian Penal Code

to suffer one year RI and fine of Rs. 500 in default to further suffer RI for 3 months



under section. 324/149 Indian Penal Code

to suffer one year RI and IPC fine of Rs. 500/- in default to further suffer RI for three months

2.

Dhan Raj

under section. 302/149 Indian Penal Code

to suffer imprisonment IPC for life and fine of Rs'. 1,000/- in default to further undergo R.I. for two years



under section. 147 Indian Penal Code

to suffer Six months SI and fine of Rs. 250/- in default to further suffer SI for 15 days



under section. 324 Indian Penal Code

to suffer one year RI and fine of Rs. 500/- in default to further suffer RI for three months

3.

Ram Gopal

under section. 302/149 Indian Penal Code

to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to further undergo R.I. for two years.

4.

Ganga Ram

5.

Bal Mukand

6.

Harish Chandra

7.

Om Prakash



Under section 147 Indian Penal Code

to suffer Six months SI and fine of Rs. 250/- in default to further suffer SI for 15 days.



Under secrtion 324/149 Indian Penal Code

to suffer one year RI and fine of Rs. 500/- in default to further suffer RI for three months.

All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Against this judgment of conviction that the appellants have preferred instant appeal.

2. Entire structure of the prosecution case is founded on a written report (Ex.P/1) instituted by informant Girraj (PW-2) with the Police Station Itawa on 2.11.1991 at 2.45 p.m. with the averments that on that day his uncle's son Ghasilal (since. deceased) had come to Pipalda Kalan from Kota after attending the Court and when he was standing in front of Gurudwara, the appellants came over there armed with lathies and Gandasies encircled Ghashilal and started beating him. Ghanshyam inflicted a Gandasi blow on the head of Ghasi whereas Dhan raj gave blow with Gandasi on his left thigh. Other five appellants gave beatings with lathies. On being intervened by the informant, Adisal Singh and Aniar Singh, the appellants fled away. The informant thereafter brought Ghasi to the Hospital in an unconscious state and submitted the report. The Police Station Itawa registered FIR No. 178/91 under sections. 147, 148, 149 & 307 Indian Penal Code and investigation commenced. The injured Ghasi was medically examined and was found to have sustained injuries caused by sharp-edged weapon. The injury on the head was referred for X-ray and the second injury on the thigh was found to be simple. Injured Ghasi thereafter was sent to M.B.S. Hospital Kota where he expired on 4.11.1991 and the case was converted into one under section. 302 Indian Penal Code. The Investigating Officer inspected the site. Autopsy on the dead body was conducted. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. Accused were arrested. Weapon of offence were recovered. On conclusion of the investigation charge-sheet was filed. In due course the case came up for trial. Charges under sections. 147, 148, 302, 302/149, 324 & 324/149 IPC were framed. The appellants denied the charge and claimed trial. The prosecution examined as many as 24 witnesses in support of its case. In their statements under section. 313 Criminal Procedure Code the appellants denied the allegations





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top