2006 Supreme(Raj) 3034
SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK
Intzar Ali @ Anjar Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Chaitanya Gehlot, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. V.R. Vehta, Public Prosecutor.
JUDGMENT
1. - This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. against order dated 22.3.2006 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Churu, on submitting a Protest Petition in F.R. No. 168/2003, whereby cognizance of the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'I.P.C.') has been taken against the accused petitioners and they have been summoned through warrant of arrest.
2. Briefly stated, the facts which are necessary for the disposal of the present Revision Petition are that Aslam Khan, who is complainant of the case, has filed the complaint against present accused petitioners, namely, Intzar Ali Anjar Ali and Jafar Ali on 17.6.2003 stating, inter-alia, therein that accused Intzar Ali told him that he is Power of Attorney Holder of the land bearing Khasra No. 154 situated at Ratangarh Road, District Churu, measuring about 11 bighas and 4 biswas, which was of the ownership of his father and as there was financial need to the family, therefore, he persuaded the complainant to purchase the same and an agreement was reduced in writing in relation to the above disputed land on 26.11.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document