SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1598

KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI
Raju @ Rajendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:R.S. Choudhary, Advocate.
For the Party: Anil Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.01.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner, dismissing the criminal appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 12.01.2011 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bikaner in FIR No.493/2010 of Police Station, Nokha , District Bikaner under Section 12 of Juvenile Justice ( Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant Munni submitted a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, Nokha alleging interalia that her daughter Manju , studying in the Adarsh Vidhya Mandir School , went to school on 08.11.2010 but did not return. It was further alleged that on 10.11.2010, Bhera Ram dropped her daughter in front of her house in the night, then her daughter informed her that on 08.11.2010 when she reached Shiv Mandir , Raju and Suresh took her in their motor cycle and thereafter, Raju sent her by Bus with Suresh to Bikaner. There they stayed in the Dharamshala and Suresh committed rape on her.

3. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Nokha sent the complaint to the SHO, Police Station Nokha for investigation unde









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top