SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 1395

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Shiv Kumar Sharma, Khem Chand Sharma, JJ.
Ramniwas S/o Heeralal and Others - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 444 of 1999.
Decided On : 25-08-2003

Advocates:
For the Accused/Appellants:Anuarg Sharma, Advocate.
For the State: B.M. Sharma, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant:M.L. Goyal, Advocate.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 148, 307/149, 326/149, 325/149, 324/149, 323/149 and 379 -appeal against conviction-common intention was not held-simple injuries inflicted on the head of injured by RD while axe blow on chest by H-"H" was in possession of the alleged motor cycle-lathi blows inflicted by RN, M, B, RP and G-the conviction of appellants RN, RP, M, RD, B and G u/s 324/149 held unjustified while that of appellants RP, M, RD, B, G and H u/s 325/149 IPC held improper-conviction of appellants RN, RD and H u/s 323/149 unjustified while all the appellant held guilty for offence u/s 148 and 326/149 IPC-accordingly H held guilty u/s 307 instead of earlier conviction u/s 307/149-after modification RN held convicted under section 325 while B, M, RD and G held under section 323 instead of earlier u/s 323/149 -appellants H and RN held guilty u/s 379, this was upheld and appeal allowed up to certain degrees.

JUDGMENT

1. - This criminal appeal by seven appellants arises out of the judgment and order dated 9.7.1999 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) Cases, Sawaimadhopur, thereby convicting and sentencing the appellants in the manner stated below :

Under Sec.148 IPC

Each to undergo one years' simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200/- each, in default thereof, each to further undergo one month's simple imprisonment.

Under Section 307/149 IPC

Each to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- each, in default thereof, each to further undergo one year's simple imprisonment.

Under Section 326/149 IPC

Each to undergo seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default thereof, each to further undergo six months' simple imprisonment.

Under Section 325/149 IPC

Each to undergo three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 300/- each, in default thereof, each to further undergo three months' simple imprisonment.

Under Section 324/149 IPC

Each to undergo two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200/- each, in default thereof, each to further undergo two months' simple imprisonment.

Under Section 323/149

Each to undergo six months simple imprisonment.


2. Accused-appellant-Hemraj and Ramniwas were further convicted for offence u/s. 379 IPC and each was sentenced to undergo one year's simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200/- each, in default of payment of fine, 15 days simple imprisonment to each of them. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

3. The accused-appellants were tried for having committed the offence u/ss. 148, 307/149, 326/149, 325/149, 324/149, 323/149, 379 & 379/149 IPC, for forming an unlawful assembly and causing such injuries to Brij Raj Singh which were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and for other criminal acts.

4. The prosecution case in nutshell is that having received the Parcha Bayan, Ex.P/3 of PW-6 Brijraj Singh, recorded on 12.10.1994, the police registered a case vide FIR, Ex.P/27. In the Parcha Bayan, injured Brijraj Singh alleged that on the day of incident, at about 9.00- 10.00 a.m. he was on way from village Adhar to his Farm, on a motor-cycle. He had with him a 12bore licenced gun. He parked his motor cycle near `Nahar-ka-khura'. One Jairaj Singh was ploughing the land known as Todraji ke Balaji, which Jairaj Singh had taken for ploughing. It was alleged that Jairaj Singh, Udaibhan, Sarupa Nai, Ram Prasad Kumhar and other were also ploughing the fields. In the mean time, accused-Karna, Ramdayal, Shambhu, Madhya, Ramniwas, Girraj Meena, Birbal son of Karna and 2-3 others came there duly armed with lathis and Gandasis and caught hold of him. The injured alleged that he, in his defence, fired gun in the air, but despite air firing, the accused attacked on him. Karna Meena and his son inflicted gandasi blows at his right armpit, while other accused collectively, with an intention to cause death, inflicted injuries on his head, left hand, left leg, right ear with their respective weapons. He further alleged that accused snatched his gun and motor cycle and having perceived that he is dead, they left the place with his gun and motor cycle. The villagers brought the injured to the hospital.

5. In the course of investigation, police prepared the site plan, Ex.P/28 and collected blood stained and controlled soil from the place of incident vide memo Ex.P/29. The police also collected the injury report (Ex.P/23) and X-ray report (Ex.P/24). Accused-Virbal, Ramphool, Girraj, Madholal, Ramniwas, Hemraj, Ramdayal and Ram Karan were arrested vide arrest memos Ex.P/13 to P/20, respectively. The accused-Ramniwas furnished information (Ex.P/30) as regards recovery of lathi, while accused-Virbal, Ramdayal, Ram Karan, Hemraj, Girraj and Hemraj furnished informations Exs. P/31 to P/36 an





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top