SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 1486

BHANWAROO KHAN
Abdul Sattar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kapil Gupta, Advocate.
For the Party: Mr. K.S. Chandel, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - Against the petitioners a complaint for commission of the offence under Sections 420 and 406 IPC was filed by complaint Prem Bai, respondent no.2 herein which was sent to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. It seems that after investigation, the police submitted a negative final report. The complainant filed a protest petition and the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class Itawa, Kota after examining the complainant and her witnesses under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 26.7.2008 took cognizance against the petitioners under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC and summoned both the petitioners through warrant of arrest. Feeling aggrieved of the order of the court below taking cognizance and summoning the petitioners through arrest warrant, they have filed the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer that the arrest warrants issued under Section 70 Cr.P.C. be converted into bailable warrants.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned P.P. and perused the impugned order.

3. The only request of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the arrest warrants so issued be converted into bailable warrants under Sect










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top