SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1525

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Randhir – Appellant
Versus
Munshi Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:K.L. Thakur, Advocate.
For the Party: R.K. Soni, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application under section 482 Cr.P.C. by which a prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the time granted vide judgment dated 22.9.2000 for depositing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- and a surety in the like amount and also for paying Rs. 2,000/- as compensation by each accused-petitioners to PW 2 Ramniwas and PW 9 Dharampal be extended.

2. It may be stated that this Court vide judgment and order dated 22.9.2000 while maintaining the conviction of the petitioners for offences under sections 324, 447, 323/149 & 148 IPC directed the accused-petitioners to be released on probation under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar within a period of two months from today to keep peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one year. It was further directed that each accused-petitioner shall pay Rs. 2,000/- as compensation to PW 2 Ramniwas and PW 9 Dharampal and for depositing said amount, three months' time was




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top