Sahab Ram vs State of Rajasthan - 2000 Supreme(Raj) 1494

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1494

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Sahab Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellant:D.S. Rajvi, Advocate.
For the State: D.D. Kalla, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The abovenamed accused-appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.7.1999 passed by the learned Special Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities), Sri Ganganagar in Sessions Case No. 271/97 by which he convicted accused-appellant for the offence u/ sections 376 & 450 IPC and sentenced in the following manner :

Name of accused-appellant

Convicted under section

Sentence awarded

Sahab Ram

376 IPC

450 IPC

Seven years' RI and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months' SI.

Seven years' RI and a fine of Rs. 2,000 / -, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months' SI.

Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal, in short, are as follows:-

On 5.5.1997 at about 5.10 p.m. PW 2 Birma Devi lodged a written report Ex.P /1 before PW 6 Narendra Kumar Sharma, SHO, Police Station Padampur stating inter alia that on 8.5.1997 she was sleeping with her three small children in her house (23 BB Bera) and her husband PW 4 Kashiram was not there and had gone to Banwali Tehsi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1494

SUNIL KUMAR GARGSahab Ram – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Sahab Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent