RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.
Sahab Ram - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 530 of 1999.
Decided On : 15-11-2000
RAPE - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code - Section 376, Section 450 - The judgment discusses the evidence presented in the case and the court's analysis of the prosecution's case. It highlights the importance of corroboration of the victim's testimony, the requirement of proving each ingredient of the offence, and the presumption of innocence of the accused. The court found that the prosecution's case suffered from infirmities and contradictions, leading to the benefit of doubt being given to the accused-appellant. The accused-appellant was acquitted of the charges under sections 376 & 450 IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecutrix alleged that the accused-appellant committed rape on her. The prosecution presented evidence and witnesses to support the charges.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution's case suffered from infirmities and contradictions, leading to the benefit of doubt being given to the accused-appellant. The accused-appellant was acquitted of the charges under sections 376 & 450 IPC.
Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the prosecutrix's testimony, the presence of contradictions in the statements of witnesses, and the requirement of corroboration in rape cases.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for corroboration of the victim's testimony, the requirement of proving each ingredient of the offence, and the presumption of innocence of the accused. It held that the prosecution's case suffered from infirmities and contradictions, leading to the benefit of doubt being given to the accused-appellant.
Final Decision: The appeal filed by the accused-appellant was allowed, the judgment and order convicting the accused-appellant were set aside, and the accused-appellant was acquitted of the charges. The accused-appellant was ordered to be released from jail.
Name of accused-appellant Convicted under section Sentence awarded Sahab Ram 376 IPC Seven years' RI and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months' SI. Seven years' RI and a fine of Rs. 2,000 / -, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months' SI.
450 IPC
On 5.5.1997 at about 5.10 p.m. PW 2 Birma Devi lodged a written report Ex.P /1 before PW 6 Narendra Kumar Sharma, SHO, Police Station Padampur stating inter alia that on 8.5.1997 she was sleeping with her three small children in her house (23 BB Bera) and her husband PW 4 Kashiram was not there and had gone to Banwali Tehsil Sadulsahar and at about 12.00 in the mid-night, accused-appellant, who lives near her house, came to her house and took her orni (clothe) and shut her mouth by orni and at that time, he was having sword and he was in the state of intoxication and he took her to another room and put her on the ground and after raising her gagra, he committed rape on her. It is further stated in the report that her mouth was tied with clothes, therefore, she could not raise hue and cry and during the struggle when she resistod, her bangles of glasses were broken and her orni was also torn and after that incident, she removed orni from her mouth and made hue and cry and after hearing her cries, PW 5 Maluram (Jeth of PW 2 Birma Devi) came there and seeing him, accused-appellant ran away from the scene and while running, accused-appellant threatened that in case this incident is told to anybody, she will face dire consequences. It is further stated in the report that after this incident, on the next day i.e. on 4.5.1997, she summoned her husband PW 4 Kashi Ram and Panchayat was called in the village, but accused- appellant did not attend the Panchayat and refused to come there and, thereafter, this report has been lodged.
On this report, police registered FIR Ex.P/2 and started investigation. During investigation, bangles of PW 2 Birma Devi were seized through Ex.P/4. The accused-appellant was arrested through Ex.P/6. The prosecutrix PW 2 Birma Devi was got medically examined by PW 7 Dr. Harbans Khanna and her report is Ex.P/5. The accused-appellant was also got medically examined and his report is Ex.P/ 7.
After usual investigation, police submitted challan against the accused-appellant in the Court of Magistrate and from where the case was committed to the Court of Session and, thereafter, the case was transferred to the learned Special Additional Sessions judge (Women Atrocities), Sri Ganganagar.
On 18.10.1997, the learned Special Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities), Sri Ganganagar framed charges against the accused-appellant under sections 376 & 450 IPC. The charges were read over and explained to the accused-appellant, who pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
During trial, the prosecution examined as many as 9 witnesses and got exhibited some documents. Thereafter, statement of the accused-appellant under section 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded. In defence, one witness DW 1 Sarwati has been produced and three documents were also got exhibited.
After conclusion of trial, the learned Special Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities) Sri Ganganagar through his judgment and order dated 15.7.1999 convicted the accused-appellant for the offence under sections 376 & 450 IPC and sentenced in the manner as stated above holding inter alia :
1. That the prosecution has prove
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.