SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2067

A.M.KAPADIA, DEO NARAYAN THANVI
Rafeek Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


For the Appellant:Mr. Sandeep Mehta, Mr. Javed Moyal, Mr. M.K. Garg and Mr.Niranjan Singh, Advocates.
For the Party: Mr.K.R. Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - Since all these three appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 19.11.2004 passed learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Nagaur, whereby he has convicted and sentenced all the four accused appellants namely Rafeek Ahmed, Gulam Mohd., Raju alias Rajjak and Jakir Hussain Gauri alias Jakir Gauri of the offences u/ss.302, 455 & 394 IPC as under, therefore, they are being disposed-of by common judgment:

302 I.P.C.

Life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default to further undergo four months' R.I.

455 I.P.C.

Five years' R.I. along with a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to further undergo two months' R.I.

394 I.P.C.

Ten years' R.I. along with a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default to further undergo four months' R.I.

All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. However, all the four accused appellants were acquitted of the offence under Section 382 IPC.

2. Facts leading to these appeals are that on 8.5.2004, the complainant Usha Devi filed a written report Ex.P.14 before the S.H.O., Police Station, Nagaur that her house is situated at Soniwada Mohalla, Nagaur wherein her father-in-la

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top