SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2423

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
R.S.Chauhan, J.
Jalaludin @ Jalal Mohammed - Appellant
Versus
Shahida Anjum & Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.787 of 2009.
Decided On : 04-11-2009

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr.Dileep Singh Jadaun, Advocate.

A major female child is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. if she is unmarried.

Headnote:

MAINTENANCE - SECTION 125 CR.P.C. - SECTION 125(1)(B) & (C) - DISTINCTION BETWEEN MINOR AND MAJOR CHILD - MAINTENANCE FOR MAJOR FEMALE CHILD - CONDITIONS - MARRIAGE - BURDEN OF PROOF

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner challenged the order of the Family Court, Kota, which partly allowed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 127 Cr.P.C. for increasing the maintenance amount payable to his wife and children. The petitioner claimed that the children had become major and were no longer entitled to maintenance.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that a distinction has been made between a minor child and a major child and between a male child and a female child under Section 125 Cr.P.C. A legitimate or illegitimate minor child is entitled to maintenance, while a major child is entitled to maintenance only if they are unable to maintain themselves due to physical or mental abnormality or injury. A female child, though major, is entitled to maintenance if she is unmarried.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is liable to pay maintenance to his major children under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohyd. Quasim, which held that children of Muslim parents are entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. till they attain majority or are able to maintain themselves, whichever is earlier, and in case of females, till they get married. The court also noted that the petitioner did not produce any evidence to prove that his three daughters were married.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that the impugned order was neither illegal nor perverse.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner has challenged the order dated 10.02.2009 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Kota whereby the learned Judge has partly allowed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 127 Cr.P.C.

2. The Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and the respondent No.5 were married according to the Muslim rites and customs. During the wedlock, four children were born. Due to certain differences, the parties had separated. Subsequently, respondent No.5 filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner. On the basis of a compromise reached between the parties, vide order dated 08.11.1995, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.350/- per month for the maintenance to respondent No.1, Shahida Anjum, and to pay Rs.200/- per month for the maintenance to the respondent No.2, Shahid, the respondent No.3, Shabina and to the respondent No.4., Shamina @ Rubina. Subsequently, respondent No.5 moved an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. for increasing the maintenance amount. Vide order dated 26.04.2001, the maintenance amount was increased. Again the respondent No.5 moved an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. praying for increasing in the maintenance amount. On the other hand, the petitioner also moved an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. wherein he claimed that the four children had become major during the interim period. Therefore, he is no longer liable to pay maintenance for them. According to him respondent No.1, Shahida Anjum was 28 year old, respondent No.2, Shahid was 24 years old, respondent No.3, Shabina was 19 year old and respondent No.4, Shamina @ Rubina was 17 year old. After consolidating both the applications and after hearing both the parties, vide order dated 10.02.2009, the learned Judge directed that no maintenance needs to be paid to Shahid, the son who had become major. But he increased the maintenance amount of respondent Nos.1, 3 & 4. Hence, this petition before this Court.

3. Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has contended that since the children had become major, they are disentitled from getting any maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order.

5. Section 125 Cr.P.C. reads as under:-

125. ORDER for maintenance of wives, children and parents.

(1) If any person leaving sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain-

(a) his wife, unable to maintain herself, or

(b) his legitimate or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain itself, or

(c) his legitimate or illegitimate child (not being a married daughter) who has attained majority, where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself, or

(d) his father or mother, unable to maintain himself or herself,

A Magistrate of' the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, at such monthly rate, as such magistrate thinks fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct:

Provided that the Magistrate may order the father of a minor female child referred to in clause (b) to make such allowance, until she attains her majority, if the Magistrate is satisfied that the husband of such minor female child, if married, is not possessed of' sufficient means.

Provided further that the Magistrate may, during the pendency of the Proceeding regarding monthly allowance for the maintenance under this sub-section, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, and the expenses of such proceeding which the Magistrate considers reasonable, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct:

Provided also that an application for the monthly allowance for the interim maintenance and expenses for proceeding














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top