1999 Supreme(Raj) 1530
MOHD.YAMIN
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. - Heard.
2. In this revision the complainant has challenged the acquittal of the accused-respondent for offence under section 354, Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. The settled position of law is that the same principles apply to revisions against acquittals as they apply to the appeals.
4. I have seen the entire evidence recorded by the trial Court as well as the judgment of the trial Court. The statement of even prosecutrix does not make out a case of out raging her modesty. The learned trial Court has not committed any error of law in acquitting the accused-respondent for offence under section 354, Cr.P.C.Therefore, there is no reason to interfere in the order of acquittal. The revision is hereby dismissed.Revision dismissed.
*******
Click Here to Read the rest of this document