SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2424

K.S.RATHORE
Manju Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Biri Singh, Advocate.
For the State: Sanjeev Mehta, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code is preferred by the petitioner seeking direction for recording the statement of the petitioner-prosecutrix under Section 164 Criminal Procedure Code afresh in F.I.R. No. 486/2009 registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 13.8.2009 the petitioner was taken by Mustgim @ Sethi and Chhotu in Bolero Jeep from Bhankrota Chauraha to Jaipur after enticing her against her will. They stayed in the night at the house of Chhotu, where both these persons committed rape with her. On next day she was taken to Ajmer, where they stayed for two days at Ajmer Hotel and there also both these persons committed rape with her. They have also taken her obscene photographs to blackmail and threaten her so that she may not disclose the incident to anyone.

3. On 8.9.2009, the statement of the prosecutrix-petitioner was recorded under Section 164 Criminal Procedure Code in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Jaipur District, Jaipur, wherein she did not level any allegation of rape against the aforesaid persons and stated that she went with these persons












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top