2007 Supreme(Raj) 2167
H.R.PANWAR
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioners:M.K. Garg, Advocate.
For the State: Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor.
For the Respondent No. 2-first informant:D.S. Garsana, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - Petitioner No.2 Rajshree and her father respondent No.2 Trilok Chand are present in Court.
2. By the instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioners seek quashing of F.I.R. No. 234/2007 dated 25.9.2007 Police Station-Gangashahar, district Bikaner for the offence under Section 366 I.P.C.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as also the parties present in Court. Perused the F.I.R.
4. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the instant petition are that the respondent Not Trilok Chand lodged the F.I.R. noticed above, alleging therein that petitioner No.1 Vijay Kumar by deceitful means kidnapped his daughter Rajshree who is petitioner No.2 herein. On this F.I.R., the investigation ensued. However, during pendency of the investigation, Rajshree daughter of respondent No.2 along with Vijay Kumar filed the instant petition seeking quashing of the F.I.R. on the ground that petitioner No.2 Rajshree is major. She has placed on record her mark-sheet of Secondary Examination-1996 issued by Board of-Secondary Education, Rajasthan showing her date of birth to be 31.12.1980 and states that she is of 27 years of age and is major. She is Law Gradua
Click Here to Read the rest of this document