SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 1455

BHANWAROO KHAN
Memuna – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Amin Ali , Counsel.
For the State: Manju Dave, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT
Bhanwaroo Khan, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This miscellaneous petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed against the judgment dated 15.2.2007 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sikar by which he ordered to initiate proceedings under Section 344 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner for committing forgery while deposing her statement before the learned Court in the case.3. The petitioner, after receipt of the notice dated 20.2.2007 by which she was asked to explain why she should not be punished for the offence under Section 344 of the Cr.P.C. for giving false evidence in the case without submitting her explanation before the Court concerned, has approached this Court.4. Facts, in brief of the case are that in the year 1996 an F.I.R. was lodged by one Farooq, husband of the prosecutrix Mst. Memuna, stating therein that his wife Mst. Memuna has been abducted by some unknown person.5. The Police, after investigation, submitted a challan against Khalid, who remained absconded for a long period. He was arrested in the year 2006.6. During investigation, the statement of. Mst. Memuna, prosecutrix, was recorded by the J




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top