SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 1421

KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI
BALI – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Sudhir Saruparia, Advocate.
For the Respondents:P.S. Chundawat, Advocate.

JUDGMENT
Kishan Swaroop Chaudhari, J. - This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 26.10.2005 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Cases, Pratapgarh (for short 'the revisional Court' hereinafter) in Revision No. 14 of 2005, Balu v. Smt. Bali & Anr. , whereby the order dated 10.11.2004 passed by ACJM, Pratapgarh (for short 'the trial Court' hereinafter) in Case No. 229/1999, Bali v. Balu granting maintenance to the petitioner at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month, was set aside.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh and alleged that she was married to non-petitioner but non-petitioner used to beat her on account of shortage of dowry, her hand was broken and now she is residing with her parents and non-petitioner has contracted "Nata" marriage with Gattu, she has no means of maintenance, whereas non-petitioner has 20 bighas of land and two wells and earns Rs. 3,00,000/- per year, hence she may be awarded maintenance.4. Non-petitioner submitted reply and alleged that petitioner without any information used to go to her parents




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top