SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 1349

N.L.TIBREWAL, P.K.TEWARI
Mool Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the Judgment and order dated, February 8, 1996 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bundi in Sessions Case No. 205/92 convicting and sentencing the appellants as under :

1.

Appellant Mool Chand

-

Under Section 302 1PC Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 200/-
Under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, Six months R.I.

2.

Appellant Govinda

-

Under Section 323 IPC to the period of imprisonment already undergone by him.


2. The appellants were put on trial along with co-accused Harnath and Ramesh. The charge against appellant Mool Chand was that he caused the death of Bhairu Lal Meghwal by a gun shot on his chest with a country made pistol. He was also charged under Sections 3/25 and 3/27 of the Arms Act. Appellant Govinda and co-accused Ramesh and Harnath were charged under Section 302 IPC with the aid of Section 34IPC. Govinda was also charged under Section 323 IPC for causing simple injury to Smt. Sumitra. The learned trial Judge after completion of the trial, acquitted co-accused Harnath and Ramesh, but convicted a






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top