1980 Supreme(Raj) 393
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
K.D.Sharma, J.
Sukhdeo - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No. 300 of 1980.
Decided On : 24-11-1980
Preparation for causing hurt or wrongful restraint is a necessary element for a conviction under section 452 IPC, and in the absence of clear proof of such preparation, a conviction cannot be sustained.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 452, 333 IPC - SUMMARY OF FACTS, FINDINGS, ISSUES, RATIO AND DECISION - APPELLANT CONVICTED UNDER SECTIONS 452 AND 333 IPC FOR ASSAULTING A PUBLIC SERVANT - CONVICTION UNDER SECTION 452 IPC SET ASIDE, SENTENCE UNDER SECTION 333 IPC REDUCED.
Fact of the Case:
Appellant, a government employee, entered the office of the District Animal Husbandry Officer and assaulted him with a stick, causing grievous and simple injuries. The appellant claimed he was requesting payment of his unpaid salary and was angered by the officer's response.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant did assault the officer, causing grievous hurt, but that there was no evidence of preparation for causing hurt or wrongful restraint, as required for a conviction under section 452 IPC.
Issues: 1. Whether the appellant's actions constituted house trespass with preparation for causing hurt or wrongful restraint under section 452 IPC? 2. Whether the sentence for the offense under section 333 IPC was appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the appellant's entry into the office and subsequent assault did not necessarily presuppose preparation for causing hurt, and that there was no clear proof of such preparation. 2. The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the appellant's lack of premeditation and the fact that he had already served a portion of his sentence, in reducing the sentence for the offense under section 333 IPC.
Final Decision: The court partly accepted the appeal, setting aside the conviction and sentence under section 452 IPC and reducing the sentence under section 333 IPC to the time already served, while maintaining the fine.
1. Swelling 6 cm. x 4 cm. on the medical half of dorsum of right hand just above the Kunckle of the ring and little finger;
2. bruise 6 cm. x 2.5 cm. of red colour on the left side of chest just above nipple in oblique direction;
3. bruise 12 cm. x 2.5 cm. of red colour on postolateral side of left upper arm in oblique direction.
He suspected fracture of meta-carpal bone of the right hand of the injured. So he got it X-rayed by Dr. S.K. Mukherji, who, upon X-ray detected fracture of the spox of the 5th meta carpal bone of Ganpat Lal's right hand. The other injuries found on the person of Ganpat Lal were, however, simple caused by blunt weapon. Police made usual investigation into the case and after collecting necessary evidence eventually filed a charge-sheet against the appellant under sections 452 and 333, I.P.C. in the court of the Munsiff Magistrate Bhilwara, who upon finding a prima facie case exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions,committed the appellant to the court of the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, for trial, under section 452 and 333, I.P.C. The appellant was tried by the learned Sessions Judge and was found guilty of the aforesaid offences. Accordingly the Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant on both the counts as stated above. Aggrieved by his convictions and sentences, the appellant has preferred this jail appeal. The jail appeal was admitted by this Court and a notice of hearing of the appeal was given to the Public Prosecutor and to the appellant through the Superintendent, District Jail, Bhilwara. The notice was served on the appellant on 4-8-1