SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Raj) 291

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
M.C.Jain, J.
State of Rajasthan - Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Niwas - Respondent
S.B. Cr. Appeal No. 86 of 1977.
Decided On : 07-03-1983

Interpretation of the applicability of the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950 to commercial establishments attached to factories.

Headnote:

Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950 - Factory Act, 1948 - Interpretation of applicability to commercial establishments attached to factories

Fact of the Case:

The accused persons argued that their establishment is a factory governed by the Factory Act, 1948, and not covered under the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the preliminary objection raised by the accused persons, stating that commercial establishments and shops attached to factories are excluded from the operation of the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950.

Issues: Interpretation of the applicability of the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950 to establishments attached to factories.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the establishment in question was governed by the Factory Act, 1948, and the employees derived benefits under that Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the accused persons were discharged as no offence arose against them under the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned Public prosecutor for the state and perused the impugned order.

2. The learned Magistrate was justified in upholding the preliminary objection raised by the accused persons.The preliminary objection was to be effected that such commercial establishments and shops are excluded from the operation of Rajasthan Shops & Commercial establishment Act, 1950 which are atteched to the factory.The case of the accused persons was that their establishment is a factory and is governed by the factory Act, 1948 and the employees derive benefit under that Act, withdrawal of notice issued under section 206 Cr.PC would mean that the accused persons are discharged as no offence arises against them under the said 1958, Act.

3. In my opinion this appeal has no force so it is hereby dismissed.Appeal dismissed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top