1993 Supreme(Raj) 568
N.K.JAIN
Pema – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. - By this misc. petition under section 482 Criminal Procedure Code the petitioner seeks for extention of time to produce the personal and sureties bonds for probation in compliance of the order dated 24-4-91 of this Court.
2. Mr Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to communication gap and postal delay the accused - petitioner could not be informed and, therefore, he could not submit the requisite bonds in pursuance of the order of this Court. He submits that the petitioner moved before the court below for extention but the same was rejected on the ground that only the High Court can extend the time. He has relied on Keshar Singh v. State of Raj., RLR 1988 (2)-867 and Bajsingh v. State, RCC 1991-91 .Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned orders.
3. This Court is aware that time for depositing fine cannot be extended but the petitioner by way of this misc. petition seeks extention of time for submitting probation bonds. Admittedly, there is no specific provision given in the Criminal Procedure Code for the period during which such bonds are to be furnished, but it depends upon the facts of each individual case on the basis
Click Here to Read the rest of this document