2013 Supreme(Raj) 1883
SANDEEP MEHTA
Ratna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vishal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 2:Abhishek Mirdha, Advocate.
For the State: K.K. Rawal, Public Prosecutor.
JUDGMENT
1. - The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the F.I.R. No. 132/2013 registered at the Police Station Pipar City for the offence under Section 306 of the I.P.C.
2. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that one Sukhdeo submitted a written report to the S.H.O. Pipar City on 19.6.2013. He alleged in the report that his brother Sugna Ram committed suicide by throwing himself in front of the train at the village Bhundana. He alleged that his brother had come to the village for partition of their ancestral property. However, his uncle's sons Tulsi Ram, Omprakash and sister-in-law Smt.Ashi @ Asu Devi sold their share of the land to Ratna Ram secretly and without their consent. He further alleged that the land continued to be in possession of all the seven brothers i.e. the sons of Banshi Lal including the complainant. Sugna Ram was going to the Pipar Courts for the last 7-8 days for the purpose of putting some sense into their uncle's sons and for ascertaining the possession of the ancestral property, however his efforts failed and Ratna Ram and the uncle's sons rejected the proposal of Sugna Ram outrightly.
3. Sugna Ram confided i
Click Here to Read the rest of this document