AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur – Appellant
Versus
The Premier Vegetable Products Limited, Jaipur – Respondent
"(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 4,250 made by the ITO on account of entertainment expenditure?
(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in holding that the receipt of Rs. 1,67,189 is to be treated as 'business income' instead of income from speculation business.
Bhandari Rajmal Kushalraj v. CIT (1974) 96 ITR 401 (Mysore)
CIT v. Dinalal Gupta (1988) 70 CTR (Raj) 3 = (1988) 170 ITR 583 (Raj)
CIT v. Hans Machoo & Co. (2000) 164 CTR (Del) 93 = (2001) 247 ITR 79 (Del)
CIT v. Patel Brothers & Co. Ltd. (1995) 126 CTR (SC) 132 = (1995) 215 ITR 165 (SC)
CIT v. Pioneer Trading Company (P). Ltd. (1968) 70 ITR 347 (Cal)
CIT v. Rajasthan Wool Agencies (1986) 54 CTR (Raj) 392 = (1986) 160 ITR 358 (Raj)
CIT v. Shantilal (P) Ltd. (1983) 35 CTR (SC) 395 = (1983) 144 ITR 57 (SC)
CIT v. Shree Bhagpatia Food Industries (1994) 207 ITR 1045 (Raj)
D.M. Wadhwana v. CIT (1966) 61 ITR 154 (Cal)
Daulatram Rawatmull v. CIT (1970) 78 ITR 503 (Cal)
Davenport & Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT 1975 CTR (SC) 235 = (1975) 100 ITR 715 (SC)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.