SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1920

R.S.CHAUHAN, VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Babu Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
J. D A. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:D.K. Dixit, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Amit tanwani, Amit Kuri, Amit Punia, J.D.A.

JUDGMENT

1. - The appellant, Mr. Babu Lal Sharma, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 7.8.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14259/2013 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner happens to be a resident of Plot No. 161, Vishveshwariya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur. According to him, he has purchased Plot No. 54 in the said Vishveshwariya Nagar. Initially, Plot No. 57-A belonged to one Mr. Naveen Chand. When the plot was sold to the original owner, there were certain conditions and regulations contained in the lease-deed issued by the J.D.A. Later on Mr. Naveen Chand sold the plot to Mr. Aakash Gupta-respondent No. 3. The said Plot No. 57-A had an area near about 311.11 square yards. According to the appellant, after purchasing the said plot, Mr. Aakash Gupta started a construction allegedly of flats. He constructed a basement, ground floor, first floor and the second floor. On each floor, he constructed two flats. As long as Mr. Gupta raised the construction in accordance with the approved plans, the appellant did not complaint B













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top