SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 2304

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.
Gurmukh Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 202 of 2011.
Decided On : 16-12-2013

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Gaurav Singh, Advocate.
For the State:Ashok Prajapat, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 2:S.P. Sharma, Advocate.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that the compoundability of the offence under the Negotiable Instrument Act and the compromise between the parties can lead to the acquittal of the accused.

Headnote:

Compoundable Offence - Negotiable Instrument Act - The court allowed the revision petition and acquitted the petitioner of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act based on the compromise between the parties, as the said offence is compoundable under Section 147 of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner appealed against the judgment convicting and sentencing them for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The matter was compromised, and both parties agreed to the petitioner's acquittal.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the revision petition and set aside the judgments dated 2.2.2011 and 17.4.2007, acquitting the petitioner based on the compromise between the parties.

Issues: The issue revolved around the compoundability of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and the effect of the compromise between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, which states that every offence punishable under the Act shall be compoundable, and based its decision on the compromise between the parties.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition, set aside the previous judgments, and acquitted the petitioner of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

JUDGMENT

1. - This is revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 2.2.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Pali whereby the appeal of the present petitioner was dismissed and judgment dated 17.4.2007 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Communal Riots), Pali convicting and sentencing the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was affirmed.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been compromised. The compromise dated 12.12.2013 has been placed on record.

3. The respondent-complainant No. 2 Harvindra Singh is present in the Court along with the learned Counsel. It is admitted by the respondent-complainant that the matter has been compromised. It is stated by the complainant that he has no objection if the petitioner is acquitted of the said charge.

4. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act reads as under:-

"147. Offences to be compoundable - Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) every offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable."

5. Thus, the offence is compoundable. This Court has no doubt that the matter has been compromised.

6. In view of the statement of the learned Counsel for the parties, the revision petition is allowed and the judgments dated 2.2.2011 as well as dated 17.4.2007 are set aside. The petitioner is, accordingly, acquitted of the aforesaid offence.Revision allowed.

*******



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top